RICHMOND, VA — In what many are calling the most dramatic legislative sitcom since someone tried to microwave a metal fork, a Virginia circuit court judge has ruled that the Democrats’ redistricting amendment was illegal, invalid, and just plain messy — much like the snack cupboard in the Capitol break room.
The ruling came down in Tazewell County, a place most political strategists originally thought was just on maps because someone lost a bet. Judge Jack S. Hurley Jr. ruled that the Democrats’ attempt to redraw congressional districts violated so many rules it basically invented a few new ones just to keep count.
According to the judge, Democrats committed not one, not two, but three procedural faux pas that even the Supreme Court would deem worthy of a stern eyebrow raise. These included:
- Calling a special session for reasons no one quite understood — probably to vote on the weather.
- Putting redistricting on the agenda when they were supposed to be talking about “budget stuff.”
- Forgetting to post the amendment 90 days before election day, because apparently someone hid the calendar in a desk drawer.
In response, Virginia Democratic leaders declared the ruling a “temporary setback,” which is political code for “we’ll be back… probably with better lawyers and coffee.” Meanwhile, Republican leaders praised the decision as a victory for “process and fairness,” which everyone else interpreted as “victory for whoever wrote the checklist first.”
The Real Winner: Lawyers
Political analysts agree the real winners in this saga are the attorneys, who now have months of billable hours debating whether posting dates on a courthouse window is more important than posting on Instagram. One expert speculated that future generations might study this moment as a turning point in constitutional law, or at least in Google Translate’s ability to decipher legalese.
Democrats Promise A Comeback
Not to be deterred by a ruling that, in one reading, suggested they might have accidentally rewritten the Constitution while everyone was distracted by election signs, Democrats vowed to keep fighting. House Speaker Don Scott reportedly compared the ordeal to “court shopping,” though sources say he actually meant “grocery shopping,” and the misunderstanding is now the subject of a separate lawsuit.
According to insiders, the Democrats are already drafting a new plan that includes a magic eight ball, a glossy PowerPoint, and maybe an actual calendar this time. “Voters will decide,” they say, which voters assume means someone will at least get to say “I told you so.”
What This Really Means
In short:
- Democrats tried to redraw the map but forgot to dot some procedural i’s.
- Judge Hurley said “nice try, but read the fine print.”
- Republicans celebrated.
- Lawyers are thrilled.
- Calendars everywhere are confused.
As one political observer put it: Virginia’s redistricting fight is like trying to build IKEA furniture during a thunderstorm — lots of parts, unclear instructions, and someone will definitely lose a screw.
Stay tuned for the next episode: “Appeals Court: Electric Boogaloo.”
Keep Political Party Animals Free
Political Party Animals exists to laugh at politics so we don’t cry about it. Satire, parody, and absurdity are how we call out hypocrisy, nonsense, and the occasional clown show in public life.
If this piece made you laugh, groan, or say “yep, that tracks,” reader support helps keep the satire sharp and independent.
Political Party Animals 